This is what an AI agent built natively for Word looks like.
Other AI agents in Word aren’t really designed for Word.
That’s why they break formatting, constantly miss things, and burn thousands of dollars on AI costs even on simple tasks.
SquarePact is built specifically for contract and complex document editing inside of Word, with accuracy and ease of use as our first priorities. Try it for free.
Squarepact contract intelligence platform showing a library of customizable legal clauses and dynamic questionnaire tools next to a Master Services Agreement template.
Generic AI agents weren't built for Word.
Manually copy-pasting text into ChatGPT, fighting Copilot's limitations, watching your formatting get wrecked by an edit. The problem isn't that the best AI isn’t capable. It's that none of these tools were designed around how Word documents actually work.
-
Numbered lists reset. Styles disappear. Cross-references break. Anything that touches your document through a chat window is guessing at the content — it doesn't know the structure. SquarePact edits at the XML level, where Word actually lives. Formatting doesn't break because we never leave Word's native format.
-
Consistency checks, cross-reference verification, defined term audits — these don't require language judgment. Running them through an LLM is slow and expensive. SquarePact uses deterministic code for mechanical work and reserves AI calls for the things that actually need them. The same checks cost cents, not dollars.
-
Generic AI tools hallucinate. They also paraphrase when they shouldn't, miss things they're confident they found, and give you no way to verify the output. SquarePact grounds every finding in your actual document — each issue points to an exact location. No guessing whether the finding is real.
-
Other Word add-ins for contract AI (yes, even CoPilot) are general assistants with Word access bolted on. They fail because the Word environment is much more complex than they assumed. So their rushed add-ins end up breaking very frequently. Even when they do work, it’s because their brute-forced expensive AI models rather than efficient, built-for-Word optimized algorithms.
SquarePact was designed from the ground up as a Word add-in — agents that run inside your document, not alongside it. The difference shows immediately.
Reviews
“SquarePact is unlike any tool I've used so far. It saves me a ton of time and gives me answers that I can trust...because it shows me exactly where it gets the answers from and links me right to that spot in the document.”
Blake Richardson
CEO, EaseAlert
“SquarePact did a great job in evaluating my proposal, I wish I had it sooner! It provided detailed critiques and recommendations that were really helpful in thinking about how to strengthen my proposal. It went beyond a surface level critique and provided concrete points linked to specific proposal criteria. I can’t wait to use it for all of my future proposals!”
Julia Hoehn, Ph.D.
Asst. Professor, USF
“This is amazing. I paid consultants thousands of dollars to create reports like this, and it took them weeks. Your product just did a better job in one hour, for a fraction of the cost.”
Government Procurement Agent
Built for the contracts you actually work with.
Pick the contract type. See exactly what SquarePact catches.
MSA review — without the 3-hour slog
Master service agreements are long, dense, and full of cross-referenced obligations. They're the documents most likely to hide a problem in plain sight.
SquarePact runs your standard MSA checklist automatically and compares the document against your firm's playbook clause-by-clause.
- Defined term consistency across every section
- Indemnification carve-outs vs. your playbook
- Liability cap and exclusion language
- Termination triggers and post-termination obligations
- Governing law and venue
- Cross-reference and exhibit verification
From a 47-page MSA, SquarePact found:
§4.2 — Indemnification: Carve-out for IP infringement is missing.
§5.1 — Liability cap: 12 months of fees vs. your playbook minimum of 24.
§9 — Termination: "Schedule C" referenced but not attached.
§11.4 — Governing law: Delaware specified — your client requires NY.
NDAs that don't all look alike
NDAs feel routine until one of them has a 7-year tail or a one-way carve-out you didn't catch. SquarePact treats every NDA like it might be the unusual one.
- Mutual vs. one-way disclosure obligations
- Definition of "Confidential Information" — overbroad or restrictive
- Term length and survival of obligations
- Permitted disclosure exceptions
- Return/destruction obligations
- Residuals and exclusion clauses
From a vendor's NDA, SquarePact found:
§2 — Term: 7-year confidentiality period (your standard: 3 years).
§3 — Confidential Information: No exclusion for independently developed information.
§4 — Disclosure: Reads as one-way — only you have obligations.
Employment agreements that hold up
Employment contracts mix legal precision with HR-driven boilerplate. SquarePact catches the inconsistencies between the two.
- Non-compete scope, geography, and duration
- Non-solicitation overlap with non-compete
- IP assignment language and prior inventions
- At-will language consistency across sections
- Severance and clawback triggers
- Compliance with state-specific restrictions
From an executive employment agreement:
§7 — Non-compete: 24 months — likely unenforceable in California where employee is based.
§8 — IP Assignment: Lacks state-required carve-out for personal time/personal equipment.
§3 — At-will: Conflicts with §11 severance triggers.
Vendor & procurement documents at scale
In-house counsel and contract managers see the same document types over and over. SquarePact turns repetitive checks into a single click.
- Standard terms compliance against your master playbook
- Insurance and indemnification minimums
- Data privacy and security obligations
- SLA and performance metrics consistency
- Payment terms and audit rights
- Subcontracting and assignment restrictions
From a vendor SOW review:
Insurance: $1M coverage — your minimum is $5M.
Data privacy: No reference to your standard DPA terms.
Subcontracting: Vendor permitted to subcontract without notice — your policy requires consent.
Commercial leases without the eye strain
Leases are long, formulaic, and full of internal cross-references that have to all align. Exactly the kind of document SquarePact was built for.
- Premises definition and rentable square footage references
- Base rent, escalation, and CAM reconciliation
- Cross-references to exhibits and addenda
- Use clause, exclusivity, and prohibited uses
- Assignment and subletting restrictions
- Default, cure period, and remedy consistency
From a 78-page office lease:
§2 — Premises: Rentable SF stated as 12,400 — Exhibit A shows 12,840.
§7 — CAM: Refers to "Schedule 7-B" — does not exist in document.
§22 — Default: 30-day cure period in §22.1, 15-day cure in §22.4.
Built for the contracts you actually work with.
Review contracts from multiple perspectives to expose hidden risks.
Deep scans of your contracts helps you catch things even your lawyer might miss.
Contract Review
Make bid/no-bid decisions with confidence.
Pressure-test your proposals so they’re impossible to ignore. Anticipate what specific reviewer personas will say before you submit.
Proposal Writing
Government Procurement
(Buyers for Government)
Draft and edit contracts with ease from within Microsoft Word.
Breeze through compliance and legal hurdles.
SquarePact Knowledge Bank
